
When we think of divorce it’s usually in terms of a legal and financial separation from a partner, with associated (generally speaking) angst, trauma, anger and grief at the disruption and loss of our assumptive world. Our assumptive world is a collective term used to define how we see the world. It is shaped by our core beliefs and our values, and by how we understand ourselves, others and society; it is an internal mental and psychological framework by which we make sense of ‘life’ and which largely determines our way of being in the world.
I’ve been divorced, twice legally and twice non-legally, so understand and know well what that wrenching apart from all that is familiar feels like. The uncertainty of the future, the housing and financial insecurity, the starting over, the worry about the impact on my son, and the emotional, psychological, spiritual and physical toll on my health and wellbeing is not only well-seared into my memories, it has left a legacy of distrust of others.
However, during my recovery from a recent relapse of pericarditis, a condition I’ve been suffering from since July 2025, and upon reflection from the cross-roads where I found myself standing, I saw divorce from a different perspective. I realised there’s another kind of divorce, a divorce from the world, from attachment to the illusion of its sole reality and from the people who inhabit it. How does such a quantum leap occur? Slowly I think, until suddenly the realisation dawns and you just become aware of the separation which is coupled with an associated lack of worry and concern about what one is separated from.
It’s not just an intellectual thought, it’s an inner knowing and a feeling of the rightness of that knowing. And what does this mean? It means that once again I find myself looking at myself, and at everything around me through a screen from the other side. But it’s also simultaneously feeling the impermanence of the visible material world juxtapositioned against the reality of non-material eternity, against the spiritual pattern of reality, against what I term is the spiritual universe.
This in-between place, this place between two worlds, is a remarkable place to be, to experience, to arrive at after a life of work on oneself. It is a place where I ask myself the question, ‘What is God’? Only to be answered immediately by inwardly knowing that the reality of God can only be felt, and therein lies the rub. We cannot ‘think’ God, we can only ‘feel’ God, this is a truth.









